DEKON Productions. (c)Judsen Garside 2002.

Current Theory on Hypertext:


Contents:

Introduction

Memex

Linking

Hypertext

Intertextuality

Virtuality

Hypertext Theory

Juxtaposition

Publishing

Design

Conclusion

Beginning

Links

So what exactly is hypertext theory?

Hypertext is a viable forum for exploring contemporary critical theory. George Landow sums this up by saying:

The many parallels between computer hypertext and critical theory have many points of interest, the most important of which, perhaps, lies in the fact that critical theory promises to theorize hypertext and hypertext promises to embody and thereby test aspects of theory, particularly those concerning textuality, narrative, and the roles or functions of reader and writer. Using hypertext, critical theorists will have, or now already have, a laboratory with which to test their ideas. Most important, perhaps, an experience of reading hypertext or reading with hypertext greatly clarifies many of the most significant ideas of critical theory.

Jean Baudrillard supports this with:

“[The real] no longer needs to be rational, because it no longer measures itself against either an ideal or negative instance. It is no longer anything but operational. In fact, it is no longer really the real, because no imaginary envelops it anymore. It is a hyperreal, produced from a radiating synthesis of combinatory models in a hyperspace without atmosphere.” (Simulacra and Simulation, 2.)

To put this into context we could substitute real with text. By making this substitution, we end up with a hypertext in a hyperspace that is located in a place “without atmosphere,” or in our minds.

[Text] no longer needs to be rational, because it no longer measures itself against either an ideal or negative instance. [Text] is no longer anything but operational. In fact, it is no longer really [text], because no imaginary envelops it anymore. It is a hyper[text], produced from a radiating synthesis of combinatory models in a hyperspace without atmosphere.


© Judsen Garside 2002. Fair dealing applies.